Skip to main content
. 2021 May 28;2021(5):CD011563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011563.pub2

Comparison 5. Absorbable tacks plus absorbable sutures compared to nonabsorbable tacks plus nonabsorbable sutures.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
5.1 Recurrence (2 years) 1 77 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
5.2 Pain (VAS 0 ‐ 10, 3 months) 1 90 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.10 [‐0.39, 0.19]
5.3 Pain (VAS 0 ‐ 10, 6 months) 1 90 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.20 [‐0.39, ‐0.01]
5.4 Seroma (1 week) 1 90 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.24, 2.08]
5.5 Seroma (1 months) 1 90 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.12, 3.80]
5.6 Seroma (3 months) 1 90 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
5.7 Length of hospital stay (days) 1 90 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [‐0.32, 1.82]
5.8 Duration of surgery (minutes) 1 89 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 9.30 [‐0.68, 19.28]