Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;11(5):1459. doi: 10.3390/ani11051459

Table 6.

Summary of findings from grey literature * for information sources and recommendations consistent with or specifying < 1 × snake length (SL) minimum enclosure size.

Reference Information Source Author Credentials Recommendation Information/Evidence Base
Basque Country, 2008 [117] Government guidance Anonymous ≥2/3 SL Common practice, consensus opinion
NSW, 2013 [109] Government guidance Anonymous 0.5 SL Common practice, consensus opinion
Kaplan, 2014 [108] Online guidance Biologist Terrestrial/fossorial
75% SL
Common practice, opinion, ‘rule of thumb’
Barcelona, 2014 [111] Government guidance Anonymous ≥2/3 SL Common practice, consensus opinion
Defra, 2018 [118] Government guidance Anonymous ≥2/3 SL Common practice, opinion
Victoria State Government, 2020 [119] Government guidance Anonymous 0.45 SL Common practice, opinion
Queensland Government, 2020 [110] Government guidance Anonymous Larger snakes
~50% SL
Common practice, opinion

* Government or other report or scientific letter identified through Google Scholar. Keys: 0.45 SL = less than half snake length as minimum primary linear dimension of enclosure. 0.5 SL = half snake length as minimum primary linear dimension of enclosure. ~50% SL = approximately half snake length as minimum primary linear dimension of enclosure. >2/3 SL = equal to or greater than two-thirds snake length as minimum primary linear dimension of enclosure. 75% SL = three-quarters snake length as minimum primary linear dimension of enclosure.