Table 4.
Latent and indicator variables | Outer loadingsa | Cronbach αb | Average variance extractedc | Composite reliabilityd | |
BIe,f |
|
1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
|
1. BI indicator | 1.000 |
|
|
|
EEg |
|
.857 | 0.776 | 0.912 | |
|
1. EE indicator | 0.866 |
|
|
|
|
2. EE indicator | 0.926 |
|
|
|
|
3. EE indicator | 0.849 |
|
|
|
FCh |
|
.874 | 0.798 | 0.922 | |
|
1. FC indicator | 0.885 |
|
|
|
|
2. FC indicator | 0.928 |
|
|
|
|
3. FC indicator | 0.866 |
|
|
|
PEi |
|
.885 | 0.875 | 0.933 | |
|
1. PE indicator | 0.881 |
|
|
|
|
2. PE indicator | 0.987 |
|
|
|
SIj |
|
.446 | 0.402 | 0.559 | |
|
1. SI indicator | −0.011 |
|
|
|
|
2. SI indicator | 0.601 |
|
|
|
|
3. SI indicator | 0.919 |
|
|
|
aOuter loadings of ≥0.5 indicate indicator reliability.
bWith a reflective model, internal consistency is measured by Cronbach α; values of ≥.7 indicates good indicator reliability.
cAverage variance extracted values of ≥0.5 indicates convergent validity.
dComposite reliability values of ≥0.5 indicates good internal consistency.
eBI: behavioral intention.
fSingle indicator.
gEE: effort expectancy.
hFC: facilitating conditions.
iPE: performance expectancy.
jSI: social influence.