Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;21(10):3538. doi: 10.3390/s21103538

Table 8.

Results obtained by the authors of [19,32,34,37,40,41,43,45,46]; the research works examined papers in order to conduct the same experiments that were tested and presented in Table 7.

No Experiment False Pos. after Ident. All Attack. Time to All Detection No. of Ordinary Vehicle No. of Attackers Attacker to Ordinary Ratio Method
1 1 165 95 5 0.05 RABTM
2 2 158 90 10 0.11 RABTM
3 1 140 85 15 0.17 RABTM
4 1 122 80 20 0.25 RABTM
5 1 110 75 25 0.33 RABTM
6 1 45 45 5 0.11 DMV
7 1 40 40 10 0.25 DMV
8 2 35 35 15 0.42 DMV
9 1 32 30 20 0.66 DMV
10 1 30 25 25 1.0 DMV
11 1 20 85 15 0.17 Motion Trajectories Similarity
12 2 40 80 20 0.25 Motion Trajectories Similarity
13 1 60 70 30 0.42 Motion Trajectories Similarity
14 1 80 65 35 0.53 Motion Trajectories Similarity
15 4 100 60 40 0.66 Motion Trajectories Similarity
16 1 120 55 45 0.81 Motion Trajectories Similarity
17 1 140 50 50 1.0 Motion Trajectories Similarity
18 1 55 90 10 0.11 RSUs cooperation
19 1 60 85 15 0.17 RSUs cooperation
20 3 70 80 20 0.25 RSUs cooperation
21 1 80 75 25 0.33 RSUs cooperation
22 1 90 70 30 0.42 RSUs cooperation