Skip to main content
. 2021 May 20;13(10):2509. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102509

Table 1.

Comparison of selected imaging techniques for nodal staging in advanced GC.

Imaging Technique Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy
CT 44.4 [22]–92% [21] 78.8 [35]–93.4% [22] 62.8–83.1% [21] 80.00% [22] 43.3 [31]–90.1% [21]
MRI 86% [36] 67% [36] 78% [55] 64% [56] 77.8% [56]
PET 40.3–61% [21] 97.7% [35] 69.9 [57]–85.8% [58] 95.2% [57] 46.1% [57]
EUS 63–83% [21] 80–95% [21] 75% [21] 98% [59] 94.1% [59]
SL 53% [60] 91% [60] 88% [60] 53% [60] 90% [60]

CT—computed tomography, MRI—magnetic resonance imaging, PET—positron emission tomography, EUS—endoscopic ultrasonography, SL—staging laparoscopy, PPV—positive predictive value; NPV—negative predictive value.