Table 4.
Logistic regression models for self-sucking presence (‘self-stimulation’ subcategory) 1.
Independent Variables | Unadjusted Odds Ratio and p-Value | Adjusted Odds Ratio * | 95% CI * | p-Value * | Positively and Significantly Predicts Self-Sucking? * (Result the Same if Age, Sex and Scanning Level not Controlled for?) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Self-clasping presence vs. absence | 2.52 (<0.001) | 2.55 | 0.45–14.33 | 0.144 | No (Unadjusted relationship is positive and significant) |
Eye-poking presence vs. absence | 1.48 (0.166) | 2.24 | 0.08–64.81 | 0.319 | No (Unadjusted relationship is also positive and non-significant) |
Hair-plucking presence vs. absence 2 | 0.09 (0.999) | 0.59 | 0.12–2.80 | 0747 | No (Unadjusted relationship is also negative) |
* Adjusted for sex, age, and scanning level. 1 One-tailed p-values are reported here. 2 Interaction not tested due to insufficient observations.