Skip to main content
. 2021 May 20;14(10):2672. doi: 10.3390/ma14102672

Table 2.

Survival characteristics of studies stratified by follow-up time frames.

Group 1
Study and
Year of Publication
No. of FDPs after Drop-Outs Follow-Up in Months (Years) Type of Material No. of Failure
(Distribution of Failures)
No. of Complications
(Distribution of Complications) *
Reported Survival Rate (%)
Edelhoff et al. 2008 [33] 21 39.1 (3.3) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 0 4
(chipping: 3
periapical pathology: 1)
100
Beuer et al. 2009 [30] 21 40 (3.3) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 2
(framework fracture:1
loss of retention: 1
1
(endodontic complications: 1)
90.5
Vult von Steyern et al. 2005 [47] 20 24 (2) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 0 3
(chipping: 3)
100
Perry et al. 2012 [37] 16 24 (2) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 0 3
(chipping: 2)
100
Selz et al. 2015 [43] 22 18 (1.5) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 0 19
(chipping: 2
marginal integrity: 2
color match: 1
surface roughness: 14)
100
Sailer et al. 2006 [41] 46 36 (3) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 7
(secondary caries: 3
loss of retention: 1
chipping: 1
endodontic complications: 1
root fracture: 1)
8
(chipping: 6
secondary caries: 2)
84.8
Naenni et al. 2015 [36] 36 36 (3) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 0 30
(chipping: 12
surface roughness: 18)
100
Schmitt et al. 2009 [42] 27 34.2 (2.9) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 0 3
(chipping: 3)
100
Reich et al. 2014 [39] 32 46 (3.8) Lithium disilicate ceramics 2
(framework fracture: 1
persistent pain in abutment tooth: 1)
5
(chipping: 2
endodontic complications: 3)
93
Group 2
Study and
Year of Publication
No. of FDPs after Drop-Outs Follow-Up in Months (Years) Type of Material No. of Failure
(Distribution of Failures)
No. of Complications
(Distribution of Complications) *
Reported
Survival Rate
(%)
Lops et al. 2012 [35] 24 78 (6.5) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 2
(framework fracture: 1
undefined pain in abutment tooth: 1)
3
(chipping: 1
loss of retention: 2)
88.9
Raigrodski et al. 2012 [38] 19 60 (5) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 3
(chipping: 2
root fracture: 1)
4
(chipping: 2
marginal integrity: 1
endodontic complications: 1)
90
Sorrentino et al. 2012 [45] 48 60 (5) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 0 16
(chipping: 3
occlusal wear: 6
marginal integrity: 3
anatomical form: 4)
100
Burke et al. 2013 [31] 33 60 (5) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 1
(chipping: 1)
7
(chipping: 7)
97
Solá-Ruiz et al. 2015 [44] 27 84 (7) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 3
(secondary caries: 2
chipping: 1)
8
(chipping: 5
loss of retention: 2
periapical pathology: 1)
88.9
Ioannidis et al. 2016 [34] 57 75.6 (6.3) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 3
(root fracture: 2
Secondary caries: 1)
23
(chipping: 16
loss of vitality: 3
periodontal pathology: 2
secondary caries: 1
endodontic complications: 1)
85
Group 3
Study and
Year of
Publication
No. of
FDPs after
Drop-Outs
Follow-Up in Months (Years) Type of Material No. of Failure
(Distribution of
Failures)
No. of Complications
(Distribution of
Complications) *
Reported
Survival Rate
(%)
Rinke et al. 2018 [40] 75 119 (9.9) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 24
(framework fracture: 4
chipping: 4
loss of retention: 5
secondary caries: 6
periodontal pathology: 2
root fracture: 2
unknown: 1)
50
(chipping: 31
framework fracture: 1
loss of retention: 7
secondary caries: 6
loss of vitality: 5)
75
Teichmann et al. 2018 [46] 20 120 (10) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 1
(endodontic complications: 1)
9
(chipping: 8
periodontal pathology: 1)
95
Chaar et al. 2015 [32] 59 116.4 (9.7) Zirconia with veneering ceramics 4
(framework fracture: 2
secondary caries: 2
29
(chipping: 15
loss of retention: 6
endodontic complications: 5
secondary caries: 3)
93.6

* Complications were defined according to the modified USPHS criteria and considered as biological or technical complications not leading to a replacement of the bridge (no failures).