Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 16;51(6):1038–1048. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719004033

Table 2.

SN and ECN functional connectivity during acute stress (RS1) and the aftermath of stress (RS2)

Scan session Brain region Peak T value Cluster size (mm3) MNI coordinates (x,y,z)
SN
RS1 Group × stress interaction
Insula, R 4.10 1120*†† 40, −12, 8
Stress > no-stress
No-stress > stress
Con-stress > Con-no-stress
Insula, R 3.88 896*† 34, −8, −12
Con-stress > Sib-stress
Insula, R 3.43 24# 40, −2, 16
3.30 32# 38, −8, 18
RS2 Group × stress interaction
Insula, L 3.82 400† −38, −18, 6
3.54 168# −38, −2, −12
Stress > no-stress
No-stress > Stress
Insula, L 3.97 232*† −34, 8, 14
Sib-no-stress > Sib-stress
Insula, L 3.85 288† −34, 6, 12
3.45 368† −40, −18, 2
ECN
RS1 Group × stress interaction
Stress > no-stress
No-stress > stress
RS2 Group × stress interaction
Stress > no stress
Cerebellum lobule VI, L 4.69 5656** −20, −56, −32
Cerebellum lobule VI, R, extending to fusiform gyrus 3.93 3392* 32, −40, −20
No-stress > stress

MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; R, right; L, left; Sib, sibling of schizophrenia patient; Con, control participant.

All effects are analyzed using cluster-level statistics, using a cluster-forming threshold of p < 0.001 uncorrected at the voxel level. For pairwise comparisons, only contrasts yielding significant clusters are displayed. ** p < 0.01 (whole brain corrected), * p < 0.05 (whole brain corrected); †† p < 0.01 (small-volume corrected for region of interest); † p < 0.05 (small-volume corrected for region of interest); # p < 0.1 (small volume corrected for region of interest).

Reported cluster sizes represented the size of a significant cluster after corrected for a small volume unless the cluster was significant at the whole brain level only.