Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;22(1):538. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12799

Table IV.

Univariate and multivariate cox proportional-hazard regression analysis of overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Characteristic HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Age, ≥65 vs. <65 years 1.34 0.87–2.06 0.18
Sex, female vs. male 1.01 0.57–1.80 0.96
Virus infection, HCV vs. others 1.32 0.84–2.07 0.23
Albumin, <3.5 vs. ≥3.5 g/dl 1.75 1.05–2.92 0.03 1.34 0.63–2.85 0.45
PT, <70 vs. ≥70% 1.51 0.87–2.61 0.14
ICG-R15, ≥15 vs. <15% 1.69 0.95–2.98 0.07
Liver cirrhosis, (+) vs. (−) 1.38 0.90–2.13 0.14
Child-Pugh classification, B vs. A 1.33 0.58–3.06 0.50
Liver damage, B or C vs. A 2.08 1.24–3.49 0.005 1.73 0.80–3.75 0.16
Tumour number, multiple vs. solitary 1.86 1.16–2.97 0.009 1.63 0.81–3.29 0.17
Tumour size, ≥2 vs. <2 cm 1.78 0.82–3.89 0.14
AFP, ≥20 vs. <20 ng/ml 2.30 1.48–3,58 0.0002 1.79 1.10–2.92 0.02
Differentiation, poor vs. good/moderate 2.02 1.04–3.93 0.04 1.18 0.50–2.76 0.71
Growth form, infiltrative vs. expansive 1.69 0.99–2.90 0.05
Formation of capsule, (−) vs. (+) 1.03 0.64–1.66 0.89
Infiltration to capsule, (−) vs. (+) 1.10 0.71–1.70 0.66
Septal formation, (−) vs. (+) 1.04 0.65–1.65 0.87
Serosal invasion, (+) vs. (−) 1.90 1.17–3.09 0.008 1.99 1.17–3.34 0.01
Portal vein or hepatic vein invasion, (+) vs. (−) 2.55 1.61–4.05 <.0001 3.02 1.38–6.61 0.006
Surgical margin, (+) vs. (−) 1.77 1.04–3.02 0.04 1.68 0.90–3.13 0.10
Stage, III/IV vs. I/II 1.68 1.09–2.59 0.02 2.22 0.91–5.42 0.08
YTHDF1 expression, high vs. low 1.22 0.78–1.90 0.38
YTHDF2 expression, high vs. low 1.48 0.90–2.43 0.12

PT, prothrombin time; ICG-R15, indocyanine green 15-min clearance rate; AFP, α-fetoprotein; HCV, hepatitis C virus; YTHDF1/2, YT521-B homology domain family 1/2; HR, hazard ratio.