Skip to main content
. 2021 May 28;21:241. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03018-1

Table 2.

Tomato plant length (cm) and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents (mg g−1 FW) under soil water contents of 75–70% and 55–50% in soils from Hanzhong, Yulin, and Yangling of Shaanxi, China

Soil Treatments Plant length (cm) Chlorophyll a
(mg g−1 FW)
Chlorophyll b
(mg g−1 FW)
Chlorophyll a + b (mg g−1 FW) Carotenoid (mg g−1 FW)
Hanzhong Control 93.39 ± 1.57 b 23.25 ± 0.75 a 8.79 ± 0.35 ab 32.04 ± 0.19ab 6.18 ± 0.12 a
Deficit 65.54 ± 2.14 d 19.88 ± 2.49abc 7.46 ± 0.68 b 27.34 ± 0.11 bcd 3.72 ± 0.08 c
Yulin Control 97.98 ± 4.24 ab 21.29 ± 1.78 abc 9.82 ± 0.83 a 31.11 ± 0.15 abc 5.62 ± 0.07a
Deficit 75.15 ± 3.75 c 17.27 ± 1.47 c 7.79 ± 0.18 b 25.09 ± 0.23 d 4.27 ± 0.13Bc
Yangling Control 103.74 ± 2.63 a 22.89 ± 0.97 ab 10.12 ± 0.24 a 33.03 ± 0.18 a 5.59 ± 0.14 a
Deficit 81.09 ± 1.72 c 18.14 ± 0.81 bc 7.94 ± 0.12 b 26.08 ± 0.17 cd 4.52 ± 0.09 b
Soil (S) * NS * NS NS
Treatment (T) * * * * *
Soil x Treatment (SXT) * NS NS NS *

Treatment values presented for comparison are the means of three replications (± SE, standard error). Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey’s test. NS not significant; *P < 0.05