Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 29;46(3):217–226. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000261

Table 3.

Correlation table and descriptive statistics

M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. Process quality 3.791 .643
2. Patient-oriented care 4.004 .571 .286 ***
3. Operational performance 3.735 .577 .258 ** .201 *
4. Collective work culture 3.994 .605 .644 *** .343 *** .454 ***
5. PMS exploratory use 3.871 .639 .157 .107 .244 ** .404 ***
6. PMS operational use 3.791 .661 .145 −.130 .408 *** .326 *** .621 ***
7. PMS incentive-oriented use 1.855 .661 .002 .076 .090 .146 .281 ** .418 ***
8. Size 204.6 218.8 .142 −.117 −.035 .062 .136 .027 −.266 **
9. Academic hospital 22% n/a .461 *** .151 −.046 .370 *** .226 ** .019 055 .289 ***
10. Specialist hospital 57% n/a −.159 −.051 .104 −.140 −.265 ** .004 −.005 −.129 −.601 ***

Note. N = 83 observations (N = 81 for size). The descriptive statistics for size are based on the absolute number of full-time equivalents, and the correlations for size are based on the transformed (natural log) of size to approach normality of the distribution. Instead of the mean for the manager and hospital-type dummies, percentages are presented. PMS = performance measurement systems; n/a = not applicable.

*p = .10 level (two-tailed). **p = .05 (two-tailed). ***p = .01 (two-tailed).