Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;11(39):10759–10763. doi: 10.1039/d0sc01221a

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d0sc01221a-u1.jpg
Entry Variation from “standard conditions” NMR yield (%)
1 No change 80 (75)b
2 No [Pd(allyl)Cl]2 0
3 No base 0
4 Pd2(dba)3 instead of [Pd(allyl)Cl]2 32
5 SIPr·HCl instead of IPr·HCl 70
6 PCy3 instead of IPr·HCl 40
7 dppp instead of IPr·HCl 0
8 t-BuOLi instead of KOH 54
9 t-BuONa instead of KOH 45
10 t-BuOK instead of KOH 42
11 NaOH instead of KOH 71
12 K3PO4 instead of KOH 30
13 1,4-Dioxane instead of THF 68
14 35 °C instead of 50 °C 41
15 65 °C instead of 50 °C 60
graphic file with name d0sc01221a-u2.jpg
a

Reaction conditions: phenyl hydrazone 2a (0.2 mmol, 1.0 M generated in situ from benzaldehyde and hydrazine), 1a (0.1 mmol), [Pd(allyl)Cl]2 (5 mol%), IPr·HCl (20 mol%), and KOH (1.2 equiv.) in THF (0.2 M) were stirred under N2 at 50 °C for 16 h. NMR yields were given with mesitylene as the internal standard, and yields were calculated based on 1a.

b

Isolated yield was given in the parentheses.