Table 2.
CaseNo. | Age, y/Sex | MMR loss | MSI status | MSH2 abnormal location | Tumor location | Stage | Gene of LGR | NGS result | MLPA result | mRNA result | LS | Family history |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
49 | 61/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Proximal colon and rectum | II | MSH2 | Neg | MSH2 -16 del | ND | Yes | Yes |
90 | 44/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Distal colon | I | MSH2 | Neg | MSH2 Exon 7 del | ND | Yes | Yes |
100 | 54/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Proximal colon | IV | MSH2 EPCAM4 | EPCAM Exon 9 and MSH2 Exon 1-14 del | ND | Yes | Yes | |
164# | 17/F | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | Cytoplasmic staining |
Rectum | IV | MSH2 EPCAM | Neg | EPCAM Exon 3-9 and MSH2 Exon 1 del | EPCAM-MSH2 fusion | Yes | Yes |
165 | 53/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Proximal colon | III | EPCAM | Neg | EPCAM Exon 9 del | ND | Yes | Yes |
168 | 37/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Distal colon | II | MSH2 EPCAM | Neg | EPCAM Exon 9 and MSH2 Exon 1-14 del | ND | Yes | Yes |
205 | 48/F | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Rectum | II | MSH2 | Neg | MSH2 Exon 3-8 del | ND | Yes | Yes |
212 | 60/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Rectum | I | MSH2 | Neg | MSH2 Exon 8-11 del | ND | Yes | Yes |
234 | 28/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Rectum | I | MSH2 | Neg | MSH2 Exon 3 del | ND | Yes | Yes |
271# | 45/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | Cytoplasmic staining |
Distal colon | IV | MSH2 EPCAM | Neg | EPCAM Exon 3-9 and MSH2 Exon 1 del | EPCAM-MSH2 fusion | Yes | Yes |
318 | 49/M | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | No | Rectum | I | MSH2 | Neg | MSH2 Exon 1-3 del | ND | Yes | Yes |
345 | 27/F | MSH2- MSH6- | MSI-H | Cytoplasmic staining | Proximal colon | III | EPCAM | Neg | EPCAM Exon 3-9 del | EPCAM-MSH2 fusion | Yes | Yes |
Del, deletion; F, female; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LGR, large genomic rearrangement; LS, Lynch syndrome; M, male; MLPA, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; MMR, mismatch repair; MSI, microsatellite instability; Neg, negative; NGS, next-generation sequencing; No., number; ND, not done. # indicates that the patient is from a family pedigree shown in Figure 2A .