Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;11(47):12777–12788. doi: 10.1039/d0sc02639e

Comparison between MetaTrans and GLORYx, SyGMa and BioTransformer for various prediction windows.

Method At least one metabolite (%) At least half metabolites (%) All metabolites (%) Total identified metabolites Output size Precision (%) Recall (%)
Top 5 MetaTrans 80.0 61.5 29.2 76 324 23.5 42.5
GLORYx 64.6 35.4 16.9 54 325 16.6 30.2
SyGMa 72.3 55.4 29.2 76 325 23.4 42.4
Top 10 MetaTrans 95.4 80.0 44.6 103 687 15.0 57.5
GLORYx 80.0 64.6 27.7 93 650 14.3 51.9
SyGMa 87.7 75.4 43.1 105 650 16.2 58.7
Top 13 MetaTrans 95.4 81.5 46.2 109 908 12.0 60.9
GLORYx 86.2 76.9 41.5 108 851 12.8 60.3
SyGMa 89.2 78.5 44.6 115 842 13.6 64.2
BioTransformer 87.7 78.5 44.6 115 842 13.5 64.2
Top 20 MetaTrans 96.9 86.2 46.2 116 1334 8.7 64.8
GLORYx 92.3 86.2 52.3 132 1259 10.5 73.7
SyGMa 90.8 84.6 49.2 127 1284 9.9 70.9