Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;3(5):e0438. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000438

TABLE 3.

Characteristics of the ICU Stay During the First and Second Waves of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Variables First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic Number of Patients Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic Number of Patients p
Hospitalization LOS (d) 8 (5–15) 341 8 (5–13) 662 0.030
Hospitalization LOS, ICU patients (d) 22 (11–39) 87 13 (9–23) 128 0.0028
30-d ICU mortality 25 (29%) 87 31 (24%) 128 0.61
LOS in ICU (d) 13.8 (5.1–26.8) 87 6.3 (2.8–11.0) 128 <0.0001
ICU-free days on day 28 0 (0–14) 87 17.5 (0.0–23.0) 128 <0.0001
MV 69 (79%) 87 56 (44%) 128 <0.001
MV (d) 17 (10–26) 69 10.0 (5.0–17.5) 56 0.010
MV-free days on day 28 1 (0–12) 69 0.5 (0.0–19.0) 56 0.32
Prone position (number of patients) 55 (63%) 87 57 (45%) 128 0.007
Prone position (d) 3 (0–6) 87 0 (0–3) 128 0.0018
HFNO in ICU 16 (18%) 87 102 (80%) 128 <0.0001
HFNO in ICU (d) 2 (1–2) 5 5 (3–7) 59 0.0027
Delay between MV and ICU admission (d) 0.08 (0.02–0.78) 69 1.12 (0.04–3.05) 56 0.0019
Renal replacement therapy 16 (18.4%) 87 8 (6.3%) 128 0.0055
Norepinephrine use 64 (73.6%) 87 51 (39.8%) 128 <0.0001
Enoxaparin use 83 (95.4%) 87 117 (91.4%) 128 0.26
Enoxaparin daily dose (mg) 70 (51–87) 87 76 (60–96) 128 0.082
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 2 (2.3%) 87 3 (2.3) 125 0.98
Antibiotic use 78 (89.7%) 87 85 (66.4%) 128 <0.0001
C-reactive protein (mg/L) (max) 284.8 (193–354) 87 183.2 (109–269) 128 <0.0001
d-dimer (ng/mL) (max) 1,768 (967–4,262) 78 1,916.0 (1,172–4,689) 124 0.24
Platelet count (103/mm3) (minimum values observed during the first 7 d in ICU) 167 (131–208) 87 185 (136–238) 128 0.16
Creatinine (mg/dL) (max) 1.46 (1.01–2.36) 87 1.14 (0.89–1.75) 128 0.0053
Bilirubine (mg/dL) (max) 1.16 (0.75–1.90) 87 0.85 (0.68–1.20) 128 0.0007

COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, HFNO = high-flow nasal oxygen, LOS = length of stay, max = maximum values observed during the first 7 d in ICU, MV = mechanical ventilation.

Quantitative variables are reported as median (Q1–Q3) and categorical variables as number (%). Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests are used as appropriate.