Table 7.
Comparison between the rMLTFL model using 2S-rMLTFL strategy (‘2S-rMLTFL’) and the rMLTFL model without using 2S-rMLTFL strategy (‘rMLTFL’)
| Method | AD vs. NC | MCI vs. NC | PMCI vs. SMCI | AD vs. MCI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACC | AUC | ACC | AUC | ACC | AUC | ACC | AUC | |
| rMLTFL | 0.921 | 0.973 | 0.786 | 0.835 | 0.732 | 0.789 | 0.721 | 0.767 |
| 2S-rMLTFL | 0.952 | 0.983 | 0.824 | 0.865 | 0.763 | 0.810 | 0.767 | 0.820 |