Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Jan 4;110(2):337–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.046

Table 5.

Linear mixed-effects model results of imaging biomarkers of injury (volume, FA, and MD) as predictors of attention raw scores.

Attention
WAIS Digits Forward D-KEFS-TM Visual Scanning

Region Biomarker Estimate (β)* Standard Error P Value Estimate (β) Standard Error P Value

Total CC Volume −0.027 0.419 .949 −2.101 −1.890 .268
FA 0.042 0.046 .367 −0.021 0.196 .918
MD −1.192 2.690 .662 1.584 8.836 .858
Posterior CC Volume −0.343 1.230 .786 −3.330 5.570 .552
FA 0.009 0.029 .768 −0.028 0.121 .819
MD −1.382 2.715 .611 3.724 9.052 .683
Mid-Posterior CC Volume 0.896 2.330 .701 −5.880 10.100 .562
FA 0.078 0.035 .029 −0.013 0.155 .936
MD −2.446 2.413 .328 3.516 8.302 .673
Central CC Volume 0.377 2.470 .879 −9.860 10.900 .375
FA 0.045 0.038 .241 −0.048 0.171 .783
MD −2.522 2.461 .311 4.891 8.644 .572
Mid-Anterior CC Volume −1.230 2.520 .627 −13.200 10.900 .229
FA 0.035 0.034 .308 −0.012 0.163 .943
MD −2.454 2.093 .243 4.198 7.430 .574
Anterior CC Volume 0.179 1.340 .900 −11.300 5.860 .062
FA 0.011 0.035 .766 −0.013 0.147 .928
MD 0.753 1.744 .670 −2.117 6.509 .745
Total IHWM Volume −0.002 0.013 .906 0.018 0.055 .748
FA 0.085 0.127 .505 −1.411 0.510 .009
MD −1.657 3.732 .660 12.190 11.473 .292
Right IHWM Volume −0.024 0.039 .532 0.158 0.163 .335
FA −0.012 0.131 .927 −1.162 0.529 .035
MD −1.033 3.835 .789 14.078 11.629 .230
Left IHWM Volume 0.026 0.038 .512 −0.052 0.170 .758
FA 0.085 0.129 .525 −1.162 0.528 .040
MD −1.851 3.706 .623 9.424 11.375 .412

Abbreviations: CC = corpus callosum; D-KEFS-TM = Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making; FA = fractional anisotropy; IHWM = intrahemispheric white matter tracts; MD = mean diffusivity; ROI = region of interest; RT = radiation therapy; WAIS-IV = Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale IV.

Note: Attention was measured via the WAIS Digits Forward and the D-KEFS Trail Making Visual Scanning tests. Models for each region of interest (ROI) and imaging parameter were created and analyzed independently. All volume models control for percentage of ROI censored. Significant results (P < .05) are shown in bold.

*

β estimate units are points/(mo*cm3) for volume; points/mo for FA, and points/(mo*μm2/ms) for MD.

Results that remained significant after corrections for multiple comparisons.