Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2010 Sep 3;67(2):559–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01487.x

Table 3.

Results of simulation study under MNAR: comparison of θ^0, θ^IW, θ^DR, θ^DRN, θ^IWS, θ^DRS, and θ^DRNS using modified weights, when ε ~ N(0, 1) and Z1 and Z2 are identical. True θ is 0.722. The details of true models and misspecified working models are provided in Section 3.2.

RB (%) SE SD SMSE CR (%)
θ^GS −0.2 0.036 0.037 0.037 94.0
θ^0 −8.1 0.053 0.055 0.080 78.2
Correct subset of Z1 and D included in (M1)
θ^IW −5.8 0.052 0.055 0.069 85.4
θ^IWS −1.0 0.049 0.052 0.053 93.0
Correct subset of Z and D included in both models
θ^DR −0.5 0.039 0.040 0.041 95.0
θ^DRN −0.5 0.039 0.040 0.040 94.4
θ^DRS −0.2 0.038 0.039 0.039 93.8
θ^DRNS −0.2 0.038 0.039 0.039 93.6
Incorrect subset of Z1 and D included in (M1)
θ^DR −0.6 0.039 0.040 0.041 94.6
θ^DRN −0.5 0.039 0.040 0.040 93.2
θ^DRS −0.2 0.038 0.039 0.039 94.0
θ^DRNS −0.2 0.038 0.039 0.039 93.4
Incorrect subset of Z2 and D included in (M2)
θ^DR −5.3 0.049 0.053 0.065 85.0
θ^DRN −5.3 0.050 0.053 0.065 86.2
θ^DRS −0.8 0.047 0.049 0.049 92.8
θ^DRNS −0.8 0.048 0.049 0.049 93.8