Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 16;11(45):12316–12322. doi: 10.1039/d0sc05091a

Optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d0sc05091a-u1.jpg
Entry CpR Base Solvent Yieldb (%)
1 Cp* TMPH DCE 31
2 Cp* PMP DCE Trace
3 Cp* i-Pr2NEt DCE Trace
4 Cp* Pyridine DCE 0
5 Cp* 2,6-Lutidine DCE 34
6 Cp* sym-Collidine DCE 62
7 Cp sym-Collidine DCE 10
8 CpR1 sym-Collidine DCE 14
9 CpR2 sym-Collidine DCE 20
10 Cp* sym-Collidine CHCl3 60
11 Cp* sym-Collidine PhCl 70
12 Cp* sym-Collidine PhCF3 83
13c Cp* sym-Collidine PhCF3 77 (72d)
14e Cp* sym-Collidine PhCF3 56
a

All reactions were carried out with 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (1.5 equiv.), Ph3C+BF4 (1.7 equiv.), base (1.8 equiv.) and 30 mol% of iron catalyst in solvent (0.5 mL).

b

NMR yield.

c

20 mol% of iron catalyst.

d

Isolated yield.

e

10 mol% iron catalyst. DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane. PMP = 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethylpiperidine. sym-Collidine = 2,4,6-collidine. Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienyl. CpR1 = 1,3-(t-Bu)2cyclopentadienyl, CpR2 = tetramethylcyclopentadienyl.