Table 1.
Number of sampled households and animals, as well as the proportion using open water sources, and the seropositivity for leptospirosis at household and animal level in Yogyakarta Special Province, Indonesia.
| Sub-District | Risk * | Village | Open Water Source | Cattle Sampled (Seropositives, %) | Small Ruminants Sampled (Seropositives, %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Households | Animals | Households | Animals | ||||
| Girimulyo | High | 1 | 59.3% | 65 (9, 13.9%) | 132 (10, 7.6%) | 1 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) |
| Kalibawang | 2 | 55.6% | 18 (4, 22.2%) | 23 (5, 21.7%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Lendah | 3 | 0% | 0 (0, 0%) | 0 (0, 0%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Lendah | 4 | 0% | 129 (6, 4.7%) | 205 (6, 2.9%) | 1 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Lendah | 5 | 0% | 51 (0, 0%) | 74 (0, 0%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Nanggulan | 6 | 0% | 25 (1, 4%) | 46 (1, 2.2%) | 4 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Panjatan | Medium | 7 | 0% | 36 (1, 2.8%) | 79 (1, 1.3%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) |
| Panjatan | Medium | 8 | 0% | 55 (2, 3.6%) | 118 (2, 1.7%) | 3 (1, 33%) | 4 (1, 25%) |
| Pengasih | Low | 9 | 97.5% | 25 (0, 0%) | 37 (0, 0%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) |
| Pengasih | Low | 10 | 0% | 109 (3, 2.7%) | 179 (4, 2.2%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) |
| Samigaluh | 11 | 74.2% | 16 (4, 25%) | 27 (4, 14.8%) | 2 (1, 50%) | 4 (1, 25%) | |
| Wates | 12 | 0% | 76 (1, 1.3%) | 137(1, 0.7%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Wates | 13 | 2.4% | 52 (0, 0%) | 123 (0, 0%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Wates | 14 | 0% | 20 (7, 35%) | 61 (11, 18%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Wates | 15 | 0% | 76 (3, 4.0%) | 163 (7, 4.3%) | 2 (0, 0%) | 4 (0, 0%) | |
| Total | 9.2% | 757 (41, 5.4%) | 1404 (52, 3.7%) | 31 (2, 6.4%) | 60 (2, 3.3%) | ||
* Expected risk for animal leptospirosis in Kulon Progo District, Yogyakarta Special Province, based on data from human leptospirosis.