Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;320(5):C892–C901. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00481.2020

Table 3.

Comparison of data from qualitative studies of shark A0 in Xenopus oocytes and functional studies of adenosine A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 receptor subtypes from the literature

Subtype Ag/Antag Functional Profiles
A0 Ag R-PIA > S-PIA>CGS21680 > CPA > 2ClAdo > CV1808 ≥ DPMA > NECA
Antag DPCPX > PD115199 > 8PT > CSC > CGS15943
A1 Ag CPA > R-PIA = CHA ≥ NECA > 2ClAdo > S-PIA > CV1808 ≥ CGS21680
Antag DPCPX > PD115199 > 8PT
A2a Ag CGS21680 = NECA > CV1808 ≥ 2ClAdo>R-PIA = CHA = CPA > S-PIA
Antag PD115199 > DPCPX = 8PT
A2b Ag NECA > 2ClAdo > R-PIA = CHA > S-PIA ≥ CV1808 ≥ CGS21680
Antag DPCPX = 8PT ≥ PD115199
A3 Ag APNEA > R-PIA = NECA > CGS21680
Antag None identified in this review

Ag, agonist; Antag, antagonist; 2ClAdo, 2-chloroadenosine; CPA, N6-cyclopentyladenosine; CSC, 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine; DPCPX, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine; DPMA, N6-[2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(2-methylphenyl)ethyl]adenosine; NECA, N-ethyl-carboxyl adenosine; R-PIA, R-phenyl-isopropyl adenosine; S-PIA, S-phenyl-isopropyl adenosine; 8PT, 1,3-dimethyl-8-phenylxanthine. See expanded Supplemental Tables S7 and S8, including references. Data adapted from Collis and Hourani (36).