Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;320(5):H2066–H2079. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00036.2021

Table 1.

Enrichment analysis of inverse differences in gene expression and promoter methylation intensity

Enriched Pathway Enrichment P Value Genes
Adipogenesis 5/130 0.003 CFD; CYP26B1; GATA3; PLIN1; SCD
Nuclear receptor pathway 7/319 0.009 CYP1A1; GGT1; MYC; NRG1; SCD; SLC39A4; TGFA
NRF2 signaling 4/146 0.02 GGT1; NRG1; SLC39A4; TGFA
T-cell antigen receptor signaling 3/90 0.03 CCR5; GATA3; LCP2
ErbB signaling 3/91 0.03 MYC; NRG1; TGFA

Pathways were sorted by Fisher’s exact test P value. Gene names formatted according to directionality of gene expression and methylation differences (bold = ↑DEGs, ↓DMCs; underline and italics = ↓DEGs, ↑DMCs). DEG, differentially expressed gene; DMC, differentially methylated CpG-probe.