Table 3.
Regression analyses of brain activity in SI with empathy subscales as predictors.
| Contrast | Model | Coefficients (standardized) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | R2 | Adj. R2 | ANOVA | Betas | T | Sign | ||
| Real hand touch—no touch | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.27 | F (5,28) = 3.02, p = 0.03 | EC: | − 0.08 | − .41 | p = 0.69 |
| PD: | 0.36 | 2.21 | p = 0.04 | |||||
| PT: | 0.40 | 2.29 | p = 0.03 | |||||
| FS: | − 0.02 | − 0.12 | p = 0.90 | |||||
| Age: | 0.38 | 2.25 | p = 0.03 | |||||
| Rubber hand touch—no touch | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.34 | F (5,28) = 3.92, p = 0.01 | EC: | − 0.11 | − 0.62 | p = 0.54 |
| PD: | 0.38 | 2.44 | p = 0.02 | |||||
| PT: | 0.39 | 2.37 | p = 0.03 | |||||
| FS: | − 0.09 | − 0.51 | p = 0.62 | |||||
| Age: | 0.43 | 2.72 | p = 0.03 | |||||
All four IRI dimensions (EC, F, PT, PD, age) went simultaneously in one model. Significant results in bold.