Table 6.
Primary and secondary analysis result for mild-to-moderate AD patients compared with matched non-AD controls
Primary Analysis | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Output | THIN data | Projected data | ||||
2017 (n = 33,749)* | 2018 (n = 849,296)* | 2019 (n = 854,374)* | 2020 (n = 859,014)* | 2021 (n = 863,297)* | 2022 (n = 867,303)* | |
AD patientsa | ||||||
Drug | €316,020.14 | €7,952,667.93 | €8,000,222.18 | €8,043,669.95 | €8,083,769.93 | €8,121,288.35 |
HCRU | €11,136,681.37 | €280,255,331.19 | €281,931,162.78 | €283,462,280.29 | €284,875,420.30 | €286,197,585.12 |
Matched non-AD controlsa | ||||||
HCRU | €7,813,166.87 | €196,618,866.55 | €197,794,580.51 | €198,868,767.36 | €199,860,184.67 | €200,787,776.47 |
Incremental costs (AD patients versus matched non-AD controls) | ||||||
Incremental costs* | €3,639,534.64 | €91,589,132.57 | €92,136,804.44 | €92,637,182.88 | €93,099,005.56 | €93,531,096.99 |
Secondary analysis** | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Output | THIN data | Projected data | ||||
2017 (n = 31,493)* | 2018 (n = 793,201)* | 2019 (n = 797,944)* | 2020 (n = 802,278)* | 2021 (n = 806,277)* | 2022 (n = 810,020)* | |
AD patientsa | ||||||
Drug | €282,272.33 | €7,109,477.56 | €7,151,989.82 | €7,190,830.99 | €7,226,679.32 | €7,260,219.81 |
HCRU | €10,302,729.73 | €259,490,629.76 | €261,042,295.49 | €262,459,969.32 | €263,768,406.84 | €264,992,609.71 |
Matched non-AD controlsa | ||||||
HCRU | €7,307,030.84 | €184,039,193.56 | €185,139,685.56 | €186,145,145.48 | €187,073,132.23 | €187,941,376.58 |
Incremental costs (AD patients versus matched non-AD controls) | ||||||
Incremental costs | €3,277,971.08 | €82,560,913.65 | €83,054,599.85 | €83,505,654.46 | €83,921,953.87 | €84,311,452.75 |
AD atopic dermatitis, HCRU healthcare resource utilization, THIN The Health Improvement Network
*The number of mild-to-moderate AD patients and matched non-AD controls
**Excluding AD patients treated with very potent topical corticosteroids, who most likely had at least moderate AD
aAD patients were propensity score matched with up to three non-AD controls based on demographics including age, sex, socio-economic status and practice ID