Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 12;11(3):907–928. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00519-7

Table 9.

Scenario analysis results for mild-to-moderate AD patients compared with matched non-AD controls when considering the impact of the externally calculated productivity loss on the burden

Output THIN data Projected data
2017 (n = 33,749)a 2018 (n = 849,296)a 2019 (n = 854,374)a 2020 (n = 859,014)a 2021 (n = 863,297)a 2022 (n = 867,303)a
AD patients
 Drug €316,020.14 €7,952,667.93 €8,000,222.18 €8,043,669.95 €8,083,769.93 €8,121,288.35
 HCRU €11,136,681.37 €280,255,331.19 €281,931,162.78 €283,462,280.29 €284,875,420.30 €286,197,585.12
Productivity loss costs €53,473,905.18 €1,305,562,571.49 €1,313,369,391.75 €1,320,502,065.06 €1,327,085,143.04 €1,333,244,415.35
Matched non-AD controls
 HCRU €7,813,166.87 €196,618,866.55 €197,794,580.51 €198,868,767.36 €199,860,184.67 €200,787,776.47
Incremental costs (AD patients versus matched non-AD controls)
 Incremental costs €57,113,439.82 €1,397,151,704.06 €1,405,506,196.20 €1,413,139,247.94 €1,420,184,148.59 €1,426,775,512.34

AD patients were propensity score matched with up to three non-AD controls based on demographics including age, sex, socio-economic status and practice ID

AD atopic dermatitis, HCRU healthcare resource utilisation, THIN The Health Improvement Network

aThe number of mild-to-moderate AD patients and matched non-AD controls;