Table 4.
Measurement of alexithymia in patients with alopecia areata
| AA study population | N | COA tool | Score (mean ± SD)a | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adults age 18–60 years; 92% with patchy AA, 8% with AT; 52% were women | 50 | TAS-20 | 56.1 ± 14.4; 42% scored positive for alexithymia | Sellami et al. 2014 [33] |
| Adults age > 18 years: Severity not reported; 67% were men | 30 | TAS-20 | 59.1 ± 11.5; 50% scored positive for alexithymia | Dehghani et al. 2017 [14] |
| Adults age ≥ 18 years: Severity not reported; 84% were women | 90 | TAS-20 | 51.2 ± 11.9; 23% had high score (> 61) and 23% borderline score (51–61) | Willemsen et al. 2009 [38] |
| Adults age 18–70 years; 33% with patchy AA, 14% ophiasis, 29% AT, 24% AU; 76% were women | 21 | TAS-20 | 50.1 ± 11.3 | Willemsen et al. 2011 [39] |
| Age, gender, severity not reported | 30 | TAS-26 | 71.2 ± 12.8b; > 30% were considered to have alexithymia | Kuty-Pachecka and Stefanska 2014 [21] |
| Controls: 60.1 ± 13.6; 8% were considered to have alexithymia |
TAS Toronto Alexithymia Scale
aTotal possible scores: TAS-20: 20 items scored on Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); range 20–100; scores > 61 considered alexithymic; scores < 51 considered non-alexithymic; and scores 51–61 considered borderline alexithymic. [38]; TAS-26: 26 items scored on scored on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); range 26–130; scores ≥ 74 considered alexithymic and scores ≤ 62 considered non-alexithymic. [55]
bScore was significantly higher than controls