Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;11(3):867–883. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00512-0

Table 4.

Measurement of alexithymia in patients with alopecia areata

AA study population N COA tool Score (mean ± SD)a References
Adults age 18–60 years; 92% with patchy AA, 8% with AT; 52% were women 50 TAS-20 56.1 ± 14.4; 42% scored positive for alexithymia Sellami et al. 2014 [33]
Adults age > 18 years: Severity not reported; 67% were men 30 TAS-20 59.1 ± 11.5; 50% scored positive for alexithymia Dehghani et al. 2017 [14]
Adults age ≥ 18 years: Severity not reported; 84% were women 90 TAS-20 51.2 ± 11.9; 23% had high score (> 61) and 23% borderline score (51–61) Willemsen et al. 2009 [38]
Adults age 18–70 years; 33% with patchy AA, 14% ophiasis, 29% AT, 24% AU; 76% were women 21 TAS-20 50.1 ± 11.3 Willemsen et al. 2011 [39]
Age, gender, severity not reported 30 TAS-26 71.2 ± 12.8b; > 30% were considered to have alexithymia Kuty-Pachecka and Stefanska 2014 [21]
Controls: 60.1 ± 13.6; 8% were considered to have alexithymia

TAS Toronto Alexithymia Scale

aTotal possible scores: TAS-20: 20 items scored on Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); range 20–100; scores > 61 considered alexithymic; scores < 51 considered non-alexithymic; and scores 51–61 considered borderline alexithymic. [38]; TAS-26: 26 items scored on scored on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); range 26–130; scores ≥ 74 considered alexithymic and scores ≤ 62 considered non-alexithymic. [55]

bScore was significantly higher than controls