Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 30;51:101242. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101242

Table 2.

Effect of AIB2 substitution in GLP-1, glucagon, or OXM on mini-Gs and β-arrestin-2 recruitment responses. Mean ± SEM parameter estimates from 3-parameter fitting of AUC data from Figure 1A and association rate constants at maximal agonist stimulation (K@[max]). Statistical comparisons performed by paired t-tests (GLP-1 and GLP-1-AIB2) or randomised block one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's test (glucagon analogues). Note that, in general, if > 1 ligand was a full agonist, Emax values were compared after normalisation to the globally fitted maximum response, whereas if only one ligand was a full agonist, statistical comparison was performed prior to normalisation, but the numerical results are presented after normalisation to the full agonist response. See Supplementary Fig. 1 for further analysis of β-arrestin-2 recruitment using a different system. ∗p < 0.05 indicated by the statistical test.

GLP-1R
Mini-Gs
β-arrestin-2
pEC50 (M) Emax (% max) K@[max] (min-1) pEC50 (M) Emax (% max) K@[max] (min-1)
GLP-1 7.7 ± 0.1 105 ± 2 0.30 ± 0.04 7.3 ± 0.2 100 ± 0 1.25 ± 0.31
GLP-1-AIB2
7.9 ± 0.0
96 ± 2
0.21 ± 0.01∗
7.7 ± 0.1∗
68 ± 4∗
0.82 ± 0.10
GCGR
Mini-Gs β-arrestin-2

pEC50 (M)
Emax (% max)
K@[max] (min-1)
pEC50 (M)
Emax (% max)
K@[max] (min-1)
GCG 6.7 ± 0.0 100 ± 0 0.17 ± 0.03 6.1 ± 0.1 100 ± 0 0.89 ± 0.18
GCG-AIB2 6.7 ± 0.1 54 ± 4∗ 0.11 ± 0.01 6.2 ± 0.1 25 ± 2∗ 0.29 ± 0.03∗
GCG-H3 6.8 ± 0.1 66 ± 5∗ 0.13 ± 0.04 6.3 ± 0.1 54 ± 6∗ 0.51 ± 0.06∗
GCG-AIB2H3 7.0 ± 0.1∗ 74 ± 5∗ 0.13 ± 0.01 6.6 ± 0.1∗ 53 ± 2∗ 0.56 ± 0.06∗