Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 30;51:101242. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101242

Table 4.

Pharmacological evaluation of SRB103H3 vs SRB103. Mean ± SEM parameter estimates from 3-parameter fitting of data from Figure 3, Figure 4 and association rate constants for kinetic data where relevant. Statistical comparisons performed by paired t-tests comparing SRB103Q vs SRB103H. If both ligands were full agonists, Emax values are shown after re-fitting data normalised to the globally fitted maximum response. If only one ligand was a full agonist, statistical comparison was performed prior to normalisation, but the numerical results are presented after normalisation to the full agonist response. ∗p < 0.05 indicated by the statistical test.

SRB103H
SRB103Q
pEC50 (M) Emax K@[max] (min-1) pEC50 (M) Emax K@[max] (min-1)
GLP-1R mini-Gs (HEK293T) 7.1 ± 0.1 103 ± 4 0.93 ± 0.29 7.3 ± 0.1 97 ± 3 0.70 ± 0.20∗
GLP-1R βarr2 (HEK293T) 6.4 ± 0.1 100 0.37 ± 0.06 6.7 ± 0.0∗ 60 ± 2∗ 0.39 ± 0.05
GCGR mini-Gs (HEK293T) 8.1 ± 0.1 100 0.14 ± 0.01 7.7 ± 0.1∗ 83 ± 1∗ 0.13 ± 0.01
GCGR βarr2 (HEK293T) 7.5 ± 0.1 100 0.81 ± 0.07 7.3 ± 0.1∗ 77 ± 2∗ 0.71 ± 0.06∗
GLP-1R cAMP (CHO–K1) 9.5 ± 0.1 99 ± 4 n.c. 9.5 ± 0.1 103 ± 2 n.c.
GCGR CAMP (CHO–K1) 9.6 ± 0.2 107 ± 5 n.c. 9.4 ± 0.2 103 ± 4 n.c.
GIPR CAMP (CHO–K1) 7.6 ± 0.2 101 ± 5 n.c. 7.0 ± 0.1∗ 92 ± 9 n.c.
DERET (HEK293-SNAP-GLP-1R) 7.7 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1 0.14 ± 0.02 7.7 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2∗ 0.5 ± 0.01∗
HCA assay (HEK293-SNAP-GLP-1R) 8.1 ± 0.1 86 ± 2 8.6 ± 0.0∗ 79 ± 3∗
INS-1 832/3 cAMP, 10 min 8.1 ± 0.1 67 ± 6 8.2 ± 0.2 70 ± 7
Primary islet cells cAMP, 5 min 9.0 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.1 9.0 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.1
INS-1 832/3 insulin secretion, 16 h 8.8 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.3 9.3 ± 0.1∗ 3.4 ± 0.4
Huh7-GCGR cAMP, 10 min 10.5 ± 0.2 27 ± 4 10.8 ± 0.2∗ 27 ± 4
Huh7-GCGR cAMP,16 h 9.6 ± 0.2 173 ± 11 9.7 ± 0.2 284 ± 38∗
cAMP 10 min (primary hepatocytes) 9.4 ± 0.1 170 ± 7 8.9 ± 0.1∗ 175 ± 12
cAMP 16 h (primary hepatocytes) 7.6 ± 0.1 206 ± 7 7.5 ± 0.0 200 ± 6