Table 4.
Associations between children’s BMI z-score and interaction terms of greenspace availability (Data from school entrance examination, city of Hannover, 2010–2014, n = 22,678) $
| Model 2a | Model 2b | Model 2c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Availability index by -NDVI) | (Availability index by UA) | (Availability index by OSM) | ||||
| β (SE) | 95% CI | β (SE) | 95% CI | β (SE) | 95% CI | |
| Sex * Greenspace Availability | 0.03* (0.01) | (0.01, 0.06) | − 0.02 (0.01) | (− 0.04, 0.01) | − 0.01 (0.01) | (− 0.03, 0.02) |
| Migration background* Greenspace Availability | − 0.001 | (− 0.09, − 0.03) | 0.01 (0.02) | (− 0.02, 0.04) | − 0.01 (0.02) | (− 0.03, 0.03) |
| Lower education level * Greenspace Availability | − 0.02 (0.02) | (− 0.06, 0.01) | − 0.02 (0.02) | (− 0.06, 0.13) | − 0.03 (0.02) | (− 0.06, 0.01) |
| Middle education level * Greenspace Availability | 0.01 (0.02) | (− 0.03, 0.04) | − 0.01 (0.02) | (− 0.04, 0.03) | − 0.01 (0.02) | (− 0.04, 0.03) |
$ Adjusted for sex, migration background, family structure, number of siblings, length of child day care participation, parental educational level, birth weight, residential density, unemployment rate
*p < 0.05 (highlighted)