Table 5.
Physical activity structural model results
| β | S.E. | C.R (t) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Behaviour | Motivation | .71 | .03 | 15.52 | .001 |
| Motivation | Capability | .91 | .05 | 20.84 | .001 |
| Motivation | Opportunity | .11 | .07 | 3.09 | .002 |
| Habits | Capability | .86 | .05 | 19.60 | .001 |
| Action control | Capability | .84 | .04 | 25.36 | .001 |
| Action planning | Capability | .74 | .05 | 19.60 | .001 |
| Social support | Opportunity | .82 | .08 | 11.11 | .001 |
| Subjective norms | Opportunity | .68 | .10 | 11.11 | .001 |
| Identity | Motivation | .90 | .07 | 19.60 | .001 |
| Intentions | Motivation | .69 | .04 | 19.54 | .001 |
| Positive affect | Motivation | .77 | .02 | 23.70 | .001 |
| Self-efficacy | Motivation | .74 | .04 | 19.62 | .001 |
Note. Regression weights are standardised. Total variance explained by the indicators of motivation was 95%. Motivation explained 31% of the variance in level of physical activity