Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;9:e11417. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11417

Table 10. Proportion of open articles funded by major New Zealand funders.

This table includes the New Zealand funders most represented in our dataset, showing the proportion of publications for each that are closed or open by the different methods of doing so. The table is broken into three: it shows the results for all authors and then splits these overall figures into two subsets, where the corresponding author was a researcher affiliated with a New Zealand university and where not.

Funder Number Closed Bronze Gold Diam’d Hybrid Green
All Authors
Marsden Fund 505 54% 10% 13% 1% 5% 18%
Rutherford Discovery Fellowship 90 44% 9% 21% 13% 12% 12%
Royal Society of New Zealand 714 54% 9% 14% 1% 6% 16%
Health Research Council of New Zealand 468 45% 13% 29% 1% 3% 9%
Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment 443 65% 7% 16% 1% 5% 7%
Total 1,519 55% 9% 19% 1% 5% 11%
NZ Corresponding author
Marsden Fund 362 57% 10% 13% 1% 4% 15%
Rutherford Discovery Fellowship 68 51% 12% 13% 0% 12% 12%
Royal Society of New Zealand 515 57% 9% 14% 1% 5% 14%
Health Research Council of New Zealand 356 46% 13% 29% 1% 3% 8%
Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment 303 65% 9% 17% 1% 3% 6%
Total 1,098 56% 10% 19% 1% 4% 10%
Non-NZ Corresponding author
Marsden Fund 143 45% 9% 12% 1% 7% 25%
Rutherford Discovery Fellowship 22 23% 0% 45% 0% 18% 14%
Royal Society of New Zealand 199 47% 8% 15% 1% 9% 21%
Health Research Council of New Zealand 112 43% 14% 27% 0% 4% 13%
Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment 140 64% 4% 14% 1% 9% 8%
Total 421 51% 8% 18% 1% 8% 15%