Table 11. Comparison of funded articles by country.
This table shows the breakdown of access type to publications listed as funded by government funding agencies in New Zealand, the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom, showing the proportion of publications for each that are closed or open by the different methods of doing so. The table is broken into three: it shows the results for all authors and then splits these overall figures into two subsets, where the corresponding author was a researcher affiliated with a New Zealand university and where not.
| Funder | No. | Closed | Bronze | Gold | Diam’d | Hybrid | Green |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Authors | |||||||
| NZ Govt | 1,519 | 55% | 9% | 19% | 1% | 5% | 11% |
| US Govt | 271 | 24% | 18% | 20% | 2% | 14% | 22% |
| Aust Govt | 358 | 39% | 11% | 23% | 1% | 6% | 20% |
| UK Govt | 199 | 12% | 17% | 27% | 1% | 20% | 24% |
| NZ Corresponding Authors | |||||||
| NZ Govt | 1,098 | 56% | 10% | 19% | 1% | 4% | 10% |
| US Govt | 52 | 33% | 12% | 17% | 4% | 13% | 21% |
| Aust Govt | 68 | 46% | 10% | 22% | 0% | 4% | 18% |
| UK Govt | 33 | 33% | 15% | 15% | 3% | 12% | 21% |
| Non-NZ Corresponding Authors | |||||||
| NZ Govt | 421 | 51% | 8% | 18% | 1% | 8% | 15% |
| US Govt | 219 | 22% | 20% | 20% | 2% | 15% | 22% |
| Aust Govt | 290 | 37% | 11% | 23% | 1% | 7% | 21% |
| UK Govt | 166 | 8% | 17% | 29% | 0% | 22% | 25% |