Skip to main content
. 2021 May 30;38(Suppl 4):2739–2777. doi: 10.1007/s00366-021-01409-4

Table 28.

Comparative analysis of rolling element design variables

Method CSMA WCA [140] SCA [141] MFO [16] MVO [142]
Values for variables
 r1 125.7227 125.72 125 125 125.6002
 r2 21.4233 21.42300 21.03287 21.03287 21.32250
 r3 11.00116 10.01030 10.96571 10.96571 10.97338
 r4 0.515 0.515000 0.515 0.515 0.515
 r5 0.515 0.515000 0.515 0.515000 0.515000
 r6 0.4944 0.401514 0.5 0.5 0.5
 r7 0.6986 0.659047 0.7 0.67584 0.68782
 r8 0.3 0.300032 0.3 0.300214 0.301348
 r9 0.03346 0.040045 0.027780 0.02397 0.03617
 r10 0.60049 0.600000 0.62912 0.61001 0.61061
Optimum fitness − 85,534.166 85,538.48 83,431.11 84,002.524 84,491.266

Bold values indicate the results of the Chaotic variant of the Slime Mould Algorithm