Table 2.
Antibacterial activity of the safrole oil versus the safrole nanoemulgel and amoxicillin as a positive control
| Name | Negative control | Amoxicillin 750 (mm) | Safrole oil (mm) | Safrole nanoemulgel (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 700221) |
Resistance (No effect) |
40.0 ± 0.70 | 11.0 ± 0.72 | 19.0 ± 1.40 |
| E. Coli (ATCC 25922) |
Resistance (No effect) |
33.0 ± 0.81 |
Resistance (No effect) |
Resistance (No effect) |
| Klebsiella (ATCC 13883) |
Resistance (No effect) |
18.0 ± 1.41 |
Resistance (No effect) |
Partial resistance (Inhibition but the zone was not clear) |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 9027) |
Resistance (No effect) |
40.0 ± 0.70 | 12.5 ± 0.71 | 20 ± 1.10 |
| S. aureus (ATCC 25923) |
Resistance (No effect) |
42.0 ± 0.70 |
Partial resistance (Inhibition but the zone was not clear) |
13.0 ± 1.41 |
| MRSA (Clinically strain) |
Resistance (No effect) |
26.0 ± 1.41 |
Partial resistance (Inhibition but the zone was not clear) |
14.5 ± 1.21 |
| Proteus vulgaris (ATCC 8427) |
Resistance (No effect) |
38.0 ± 2.80 | 11.5 ± 0.70 | 17 ± 0.5 |
| Candida |
Resistance (No effect) |
Resistance (No effect) |
17.0 ± 0.80 | 22.0 ± 1.70 |