Skip to main content
. 2021 May 29;22:288. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04206-4

Table 3.

Compare with DeepPromise predictors

Species Classifiers AUROC MCC ACC Precision Recall
Human DeepPromise 0.8302 0.5164 0.7576 0.7769 0.7196
BiLSTMDeepPromise 0.8592 0.5707 0.7780 0.8593 0.6626
EDLm6APred 0.8660 0.5819 0.7843 0.8617 0.6750
Mouse DeepPromise 0.8381 0.5242 0.7613 0.7832 0.7272
BiLSTMDeepPromise 0.8524 0.5625 0.7760 0.8409 0.6847
EDLm6APred 0.8588 0.5664 0.7754 0.8579 0.6639
Mix DeepPromise 0.8348 0.5208 0.7599 0.7766 0.7298
BiLSTMDeepPromise 0.8546 0.5748 0.7840 0.8354 0.7075
EDLm6APred 0.8605 0.5787 0.7862 0.8355 0.7128

The evaluation indexes with EDLm6 APred better than DeepPromise are show in bold