Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 13;2020(10):CD013686. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013686.pub2

1. Data imputed.

Study ID Outcome Data imputed from Mean/median (intervention arm) SD IQR (from graph) Mean/median (control arm) SD IQR (from graph) Statistical test used for comparison
Desarda 2014 (RCT ‐ split mouth) Less than 1 ft Graph 12.5 3.5 ‐‐ 13.5 5.75 ‐‐ Student t test
More than 1 ft 11.5 4.5 ‐‐ 12.5 5.5 ‐‐
Devker 2012 (RCT ‐ split mouth) Less than 1 ft SD calculated from mean and P value of 0.01 18.13 176.41 ‐‐ 107.13 176.41 ‐‐ Paired t test
More than 1 ft 7.3 26.88 ‐‐ 20.86 26.88 ‐‐
Hallier 2010 (CCT ‐ split‐mouth design) Cavity preparation IQR is imputed from the
graph.
SD = IQR/1.35 (6.5.2.5, Higgins 2019)
38.4 10.2 (imputed) 34.5
48.3
105.1 37.19 (imputed) 82.8
133
Wilcoxon signed rank test
Ultrasonic scaling 38.5 6.15 (imputed) 36
44.3
70.9 12.37 (imputed) 62.1
78.8
Williams 1970 (CCT ‐ split mouth) At 30 inches (approx 76 cm) from floor using Reynier slit sampler Borrowed 80.67 and 2.6 from Larato 1967 and multiplied with the ratio of the outcomes in both studies to get an SD related to the size of the effect 0.6* (*calculated from the data given in table 1 of the article) 239.8 (imputed) ‐‐ 319.74* 239.8 (imputed) ‐‐ ‐‐
At 8 to 12 inches (20 to 30 cm) from participant's mouth using Andersen sampler 2.04* ‐‐ 485.6* ‐‐ ‐‐