Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 13;2020(10):CD013686. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013686.pub2

Klyn 2001.

Methods Trial design: RCT‐split mouth design
Location: Keesler Air Force Base, United States Air Force, USA
Setting: dental operatory
Language: English
Number of centres: 1
Study period: not mentioned
Funding source: no financial interest in any products, equipment or companies cited in the manuscript
Study protocol: not available
Participants Age: 21 to 63 years
Sex: not reported
Total number of participants: 15
Inclusion criteria: volunteers whose treatment plan included complete mouth ultrasonic scaling without any history of cardiac or renal or hepatic or blood dyscrasia or immunosuppresive problems, antibiotic intake and not undergone dental treatment 3 months prior to the study period.
Exclusion criteria: breastfeeding women
Number randomised: not reported
Randomisation of quadrant: done
Random sequence generation: not reported
Allocation concealment: not reported
Method of blinding: the medical laboratory technician who recorded the CFU was blinded and reported based only on the culture plate number.
Number evaluated (withdrawals/missing participants): none
Interventions Comparison: ultrasonic scaling done on each quadrant. Each group was treated in a different room.
Group 1: control (no aerosol reduction device (ARD) or preoperative CHX)
Group 2: ARD only
Group 3: preoperative CHX rinse only
Group 4: use of both ARD and CHX rinse
Washout period: not reported
Number of intervention groups: 3
Intervention:
Group name: ARD (Group 2)
Description of intervention: SAFETY Suction ARD was attached to the high‐speed evacuation system and the cavitron handpiece
Any co‐interventions: saliva ejector was used in all groups
Comparator:
Group name: control (Group 1)
Group name: teeth were scaled using ultrasonic scaler for 5 minutes using a newly purchased 30,000 hz scaler and distilled water without ARD or CHX rinse.
Number of control groups: 1
Outcomes Outcome name: reduction in level of contamination in aerosols
Outcome measurement: CFU (using blood agar plates) aerobic culture were done. 3 culture plates were placed on a plexiglass mount 6 inches and 1 agar plate on left side 2 feet from patient's oral cavity.
Effect estimate: mean (SD)
Key conclusions: ARD or preoperative CHX rinse reduces bacterial contamination in aerosols during ultrasonic scaling. ARD reduces more contamination when compared to preoperative CHX rinse and combination of ARD and preoperative CHX rinse had no additional benefit when compared to the use of ARD alone.
Notes Washout period not reported