Skip to main content
. 2021 May 20;8(6):1343–1352. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51373

Table 2.

9‐HPT‐1 and mFARS‐neuro scores.

Placebo

(n = 27)

Luvadaxistat

75 mg BID

(n = 14)

Luvadaxistat

300 mg BID

(n = 26)

Mean 9HPT at baseline 66.37 (29.62) 79.64 (42.93) 66.43 (27.22)
9‐HPT‐1 (1/seconds)
Baseline, mean (SD) 0.01711 (0.005489) 0.01571 (0.006871) 0.01778 (0.007747)
Mean at week 12 (SD) 1 0.01798 (0.004780) 0.01538 (0.005804) 0.01750 (0.008345)
Mean change from baseline at week 12 (SD) 0.00029 (0.003071) –0.00031 (0.001033) –0.00059 (0.001611)
Difference in LS mean (SE) vs placebo at week 12 –0.00054 (0.000746) –0.00069 (0.000616)
Adjusted one‐sided p value vs placebo 1.00 1.00
mFARS‐neuro total score
Baseline, mean (SD) 50.83 (13.55) 51.01 (13.64) 51.12 (13.27)
Mean at week 12 (SD) 1 46.79 (12.75) 49.27 (14.75) 50.20 (13.69)
Mean change from baseline at week 12 (SD) –2.95 (3.14) –1.00 (3.37) –1.43 (3.77)
Difference in LS mean (SE) vs placebo at week 12 2.02 (1.27) 2.11 (1.05)
Adjusted one‐sided p value vs placebo 0.942 0.975

A larger 9‐HPT‐1 score indicates better function; a negative change in 9‐HPT‐1 indicates worsened function. A negative change in mFARS‐neuro indicates improvement.

9‐HPT, nine‐hole peg test; 9‐HPT 1 , inverse of the time in seconds to complete the nine‐hole peg test; BID, twice daily; LS, least‐squares; mFARS‐neuro, modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale neurological examination; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.

1

At week 12, n = 24 for placebo, n = 12 for luvadaxistat 75 mg BID, and n = 24 for luvadaxistat 300 mg BID.