Skip to main content
. 2021 May 20;8(6):1343–1352. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51373

Table 3.

Other secondary endpoints.

Placebo

(n = 27)

Luvadaxistat

75 mg BID

(n = 14)

Luvadaxistat

300 mg BID

(n = 26)

T25FW: change from baseline at week 12 (seconds) 1
Patients, n 11 5 10
Mean (SD) –0.29 (0.73) 1.10 (2.57) –1.25 (3.27)
Difference in LS mean (SE) vs placebo at week 12 2.18 (1.08) 0.78 (0.82)
One‐sided p value vs placebo 0.972 0.825
FARS ADLs score: change from baseline at week 12 2
Patients, n 24 12 24
Mean (SD) –0.40 (2.62) –0.29 (2.19) –0.52 (2.02)
Difference in LS mean (SE) vs placebo at week 12 0.24 (0.82) 0.37 (0.68)
One‐sided p value vs placebo 0.616 0.708
PGI‐S: change from baseline at week 12 3
Patients, n 24 12 24
Patients, n (%)
Improved 6 (25.0) 5 (41.7) 5 (20.8)
No change 16 (66.7) 6 (50.0) 19 (79.2)
Worsened 2 (8.3) 1 (8.3) 0 (0.0)
One‐sided p value vs placebo 0.194 0.408

BID, twice daily; FARS ADLs, activities of daily living component of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale; LS, least‐squares; PGI‐S, Patient Global Impression‐Severity scale; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; T25FW, timed 25‐foot walk.

1

T25FW was assessed only in participants who could walk. A negative change from baseline in T25FW indicates improvement.

2

A negative change from baseline in FARS ADLs score indicates improvement.

3

Change pertains to upper extremity functioning.