Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Pollut. 2021 Mar 22;280:117002. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117002

Table 4.

Multivariable linear regression models between maternal urinary glyphosate or AMPA and male AGD measures (N=49)

AGD-AS AGD-AP
continuous exposure Beta SE p 95%CI Beta SE p 95%CI
Log SpG-adj glyphosatea 0.26 0.73 0.72 (−1.20, 1.72) 0.57 0.83 0.50 (−1.10, 2.24)
Log SpG-adj glyphosateb 0.37 0.68 0.59 (−0.99, 1.73) 0.78 0.69 0.26 (−0.61, 2.16)
Log SpG-adj AMPAa −0.11 0.60 0.86 (−1.31, 1.09) −0.26 0.69 0.71 (−1.64, 1.12)
Log SpG-adj AMPAb −0.31 0.56 0.58 (−1.43, 0.82) −0.52 0.57 0.36 (−1.68, 0.63)
categorical exposure Beta SE p 95%CI Beta SE p 95%CI
Glyphosate highc 0.91 1.26 0.48 (−1.6, 3.4) 0.84 1.45 0.57 (−2.1, 3.8)
Glyphosate highd 1.06 1.18 0.37 (−1.3, 3.4) 1.19 1.21 0.33 (−1.2, 3.6)
AMPA highc 1.09 1.25 0.38 (−1.4, 3.6) 0.86 1.44 0.55 (−2.0, 3.8)
AMPA highd 0.21 1.21 0.86 (−2.2, 2.6) −0.60 1.24 0.63 (−3.1, 1.9)

SE, standard error; Log, natural log; SpG-adj, specific gravity-adjusted

a

unadjusted continuous exposure models

b

continuous exposure models adjusted for infant age (weeks) and weight-for-length Z-score at AGD exam

c

unadjusted models (exposure dichotomized at the median)

d

models (exposure dichotomized at the median) adjusted for infant age (weeks) and weight-for-length Z-score at AGD exam