Table 2.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with BA in the training data set.
| OR | 95% CI | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | Ref | ||
| Male | 0.30 | 0.23–0.56 | <0.0001 | |
| Size of liver | Enlargement | 1.32 | 0.84–2.06 | 0.22 |
| Fasting gallbladder filling | No | Ref | ||
| Poor | 1.32 | 0.84–2.06 | 0.55 | |
| Generally filled | 1.20 | 0.65–1.26 | 0.24 | |
| Well-filled | 0.21 | 0.10–0.43 | <0.0001 | |
| Fasting gallbladder visibility | No | Ref | ||
| Yes | 0.27 | 0.12–0.59 | 0.0014 | |
| Common bile duct visibility | Invisible | Ref | ||
| Unclear | 2.42 | 0.75–10.98 | 0.18 | |
| Fine | 0.46 | 0.27–0.78 | 0.0046 | |
| Normal | 0.30 | 0.15–0.59 | 0.00056 | |
| log(ALP) | 0.45 | 0.27–0.72 | 0.0016 | |
| log(DBIL) | 2.07 | 0.85–3.63 | 0.087 | |
| log(GGT) | 3.11 | 2.52–4.08 | <0.0001 | |
| log(TBIL) | 1.21 | 0.51–3.02 | 0.65 |
OR, odds ratio; Ci, confidential interval; Ref, reference.