Table 2.

List of Values Corresponding to the Bar Graphs in Figures 3–6

	DUMB	RF	MLP	LDA	CART	NB	SVM
EPO vs. LEV	0.50 ± 0.21	0.88 ± 0.12	0.87 ± 0.14	0.92 ± 0.11	0.73 ± 0.21	0.87 ± 0.14	0.85 ± 0.15
EPO vs. MIN	0.53 ± 0.28	1.0 ± 0.00	0.95 ± 0.10	0.90 ± 0.14	0.93 ± 0.9	0.92 ± 0.11	0.92 ± 0.11
EPO vs. NIC	0.40 ± 0.24	0.70 ± 0.22	0.80 ± 0.16	0.70 ± 0.22	0.90 ± 0.13	0.65 ± 0.21	0.60 ± 0.20
EPO vs. AMT	0.55 ± 0.23	0.82 ± 0.21	0.88 ± 0.12	0.78 ± 0.18	0.58 ± 0.18	0.68 ± 0.20	0.70 ± 0.20
LEV vs. MIN	0.50 ± 0.19	0.93 ± 0.10	1.0 ± 0.00	0.92 ± 0.11	0.92 ± 0.11	0.95 ± 0.10	0.90 ± 0.20
LEV vs. NIC	0.60 ± 0.20	0.92 ± 0.11	0.87 ± 0.14	0.85 ± 0.15	0.88 ± 012	0.92 ± 0.11	0.90 ± 0.13
LEV vs. AMT	0.53 ± 0.28	0.62 ± 0.21	0.83 ± 0.15	0.95 ± 0.10	0.67 ± 0.21	0.73 ± 0.15	0.81 ± 0.17
MIN vs. NIC	0.53 ± 0.21	0.88 ± 0.12	0.90 ± 0.13	0.92 ± 0.11	0.85 ± 0.12	0.87 ± 0.14	0.90 ± 0.13
MIN vs. AMT	0.53 ± 0.19	0.85 ± 0.13	0.88 ± 0.13	0.90 ± 0.13	0.83 ± 0.15	0.88 ± 0.13	0.98 ± 0.05
NIC vs. AMT	0.58 ± 0.18	0.73 ± .18	0.47 ± 0.19	0.72 ± 0.16	0.52 ± 0.26	0.52 ± 0.19	0.73 ± 0.15

Top performing classifiers are noted in bold for each pairwise comparison.