Table 2.
Site | Indicator group | Log10 difference in the upstream and downstream concentrations, log10(Cdownstream/Cupstream) |
Sample size (N) | pa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | Median | SDb | ||||
Alvarado Creek | E. coli | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 8 | 0.016 |
Enterococci | −0.04 | −0.05 | 0.16 | 8 | 0.225 | |
Forester channel | E. coli | 0.59 | 0.39 | 0.65 | 8 | 0.018 |
Enterococci | 0.24 | −0.01 | 0.83 | 8 | 0.221 | |
Fashion Valley | E. coli | 1.15 | 1.04 | 0.56 | 4 | 0.013 |
Enterococci | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 4 | 0.011 | |
Overall pooled (all three sites) | E. coli | 0.53 | 0.30 | 0.60 | 20 | 0.006 |
Enterococci | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.59 | 20 | 0.147 |
One-tailed, paired sample t-test of log10-transformed concentrations from upstream and downstream samples. The null hypothesis is that upstream and downstream concentrations are equal; the alternative hypothesis is that downstream concentrations are greater.
SD of the log10 difference between the concentrations in samples collected directly downstream and directly upstream.
SD, standard deviation.