Skip to main content
. 2021 May 31;56(10):2432–2444. doi: 10.1038/s41409-021-01328-4

Table 2.

Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analysis (37 months).

IRM NRM Relapse OS PFS
UVA MVA UVA MVA UVA MVA UVA MVA UVA MVA
Incidence % (HR. 95% C.I.) Incidence % (HR. 95% C.I.) Incidence % (HR. 95% C.I.) Probability % (HR. 95% C.I.) Probability % (HR. 95% C.I.)
(95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)
Disease status at transplant
 Complete remission (1st and 2nd)a 20 (13–27) NA 27 (19–34) NA 11 (5–16) 0.26 (0.14–0.5) 61 (57–65) 0.41 (0.28–0.6) 59 (54–64) 0.44 (0.3–0.63)
 Other status/responses 18 (10–25) 36 (26–46) 35 (25–45) 34 (29–39) 31 (26–36)
 p value 0.1 0.7 0.07 0.05 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
rDRI
 Low-intermediate* 20 (13–26) NA 30 (23–38) NA 16 (10–22) 0.44 (0.24–0.79) 54 (50–58) NA 52 (48–56) 0.64 (0.44–0.9)
 High-very high 17 (8–25) 30 (19–40) 32 (21–42) 40 (34–46) 39 (33–45)
 p value 0.7 0.6 0.66 0.38 0.001 0.006 0.008 0.07 0.003 0.02
Prior alloSCT
 No* 18 (11–23) NA 28 (22–34) 0.55 (0.33–0.9) 19 (14–25) NA 52 (48–56) NA 49 (45–53) NA
 Yes 26 (9–42) 44 (26–63) 26 (9–42) 29 (21–38) 29 (20–38)
 p value 0.3 0.3 0.02 0.02 0.3 0.8 0.001 0.117 0.001 0.09
Recipient years at transplant
 <50* 13 (7–199 0.34 (0.17–0.64) 25 (17–33) 0.5 (0.3–0.83) 21 (14–29) NA 54 (49–59) 0.62 (0.43–0.9) 52 (47–57) 0.65 (0.45–0.9)
 ≥50 26 (17–34) 37 (28–46) 20 (12–28) 44 (39–49) 42 (37–47)
 p value 0.02 0.002 0.06 0.008 0.7 0.35 0.13 0.02 0.2 0.023
Grade 3–4 acute GvHD
 No* 17 (11–22) 0.47 (0.23–0.9) 26 (20–33) 0.41 (0.24–0.72) 21 (15–26) NA 53 (49–57) 0.48 (0.29–0.78) 50 (46–54) NA
 Yes 36 (18–53) 58 (41–76) 17 (3–31) 28 (20–36) 24 (16–32)
 p value 0.03 0.05 0.001 0.002 0.6 0.22 0.007 0.003 0.02 0.07
Underlying disease
 Myeloid* 15 (9–22) 0.49 (0.26–0.9) 28 (20–36) NA 18 (11–25) NA 51 (46–56) NA 50 (45–55) NA
 Lymphoid 23 (15–31) 33 (24–42) 24 (16–33) 49 (44–54) 44 (39–49)
 p value 0.1 0.032 0.4 0.8 0.34 0.72 0.4 0.7 0.24 0.3

aReference variables in the MVA. In addition to the variables included in the table, other variables analyzed in the UVA and subsequently included in the MVA were: patient and donor sex, stem cell source, type of conditioning regimen (myeloablative vs. reduced-intensity), TBF conditioning vs. other, type of GvHD prophylaxis (tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine-MMF).