Table 3.

Participant Survey Feedback Form

At the co-design session …		Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neither disagree nor agree	Agree	Strongly agree	N/A
1	The group work felt collaborative
2	My contribution was valued
3	People attended who do not usually have representation (i.e. people with refugee and migrant backgrounds, people with diverse sexual orientation, people experiencing health accessibility issues)
4	The voices of refugee and/or migrant end users were heard
5	The roles and responsibilities of my participation were clearly defined
6	I understood both the processes and the language used
7	My time participating was compensated appropriately
8	There was a commitment by Shifra staff to develop consensus on what the end product should include
9	All co-designers were kept informed of any changes
10	I felt respected by Shifra staff
11	I felt respected by all co-design partners
12	Shifra staff offered me an opportunity for skill development and capability building
13	Shifra staff offered me co-design training and resources
14	There were strategies to involve people with different communication needs
15	There was enough time to allow relationship building
16	Shifra staff made attempts to reduce any power imbalance (e.g. between health professionals and refugees)
17	I felt safe sharing my opinions
18	Refugee and/or migrant end users helped shape the common agenda
19	I would participate in another co-design session with Shifra staff
20	I would encourage others to participate in a co-design session with Shifra staff
21	I see my ideas and contributions reflected in the final Shifra website/app

Comments/Feedback: