Skip to main content
. 2021 May 31;2021(5):CD012423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012423.pub2

2. Comparison 1. Training versus no training, wait‐list, or placebo: readiness to respond.

Outcome or subgroup title No of studies No of participants Statistical method Effect size (95% CI)
HCP readiness to respond 6 487 Std mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI) 2.44 (1.51 to 3.37)
HCP readiness to respond 6 487 Std mean difference (IV, fixed, 95% CI) 1.50 (1.30 to 1.71)
HCP readiness to respond (no inflation of standard error for Short 2006b) 6 487 Std mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI) 2.43 (1.51 to 3.35)
HCP readiness to respond (no inflation of standard error for Short 2006b) 6 487 Std mean difference (IV, fixed, 95% CI) 1.51 (1.31 to 1.72)
HCP readiness to respond (30% inflation of standard error for Short 2006b) 6 487 Std mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI) 2.44 (1.50 to 3.39)
HCP readiness to respond (30% inflation of standard error for Short 2006b) 6 487 Std mean difference (IV, fixed, 95% CI) 1.49 (1.28 to 1.70)
HCP readiness to respond (without Cutshall 2019) 5 434 Std mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI) 1.61 (1.14 to 2.07)
ADVR training 5 434 Std mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI) 1.61 (1.14 to 2.07)
< 1 day of training 5 434 Std mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI) 1.61 (1.14 to 2.07)
Didactic technique: role play 2 289 Std mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI) 1.27 (0.63 to 1.90)
Didactic technique: case studies 2 115 Std mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI) 1.98 (1.51 to 2.45)
Didactic technique: case studies 2 115 Std mean difference (IV, fixed, 95% CI) 1.98 (1.51 to 2.45)
CI: confidence interval; HCP: healthcare professional; No: number; Std: standardised; IV: inverse variance