Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Adolesc. 2021 Apr 7;31(2):469–481. doi: 10.1111/jora.12618

Table 4.

Next-Day Cross Lagged Multilevel Models of Associations between Daily Technology Use and Parent-Adolescent Offline Interactions

Offline Parent-Adolescent Interactions
Parent Hassles Parent Uplifts Time Spent with Close Others

Day X-1→Day X b (SE)
β
P
b (SE)
β
p
b (SE)
β
p
Texts Sent
 Texts Sent→Offline Interactions −.003 (.005) −.028 .606 −.007 (.005) −.074 .164 −.002 (.001) −.062 .005
 Offline Interactions →Texts Sent −.231 (2.233) −.003 .917 −.267 (1.036) −.004 .797 −.169 (.319) −.009 .596
Tech for School Work
 Tech→ Offline Interactions −.036 (.034) −.022 .284 −.026 (.041) −.015 .522 .004 (.012) .005 .753
 Offline Interactions →Tech −.043 (.063) −.010 .499 .082 (.073) .019 .261 −.003 (.024) −.002 .901
Tech for Communication
 Tech→ Offline Interactions .066 (.023) .048 .005 .015 (.029) .010 .597 .004 (.010) .007 .639
 Offline Interactions →Tech −.063 (.072) −.012 .384 .136 (.104) .027 .192 −.050 (.032) −.028 .117
Tech for Entertainment
 Tech→ Offline Interactions .075 (.032) .061 .021 −.003 (.033) −.003 .919 −.011 (.012) −.020 .353
 Offline Interactions →Tech −.116 (.096) −.020 .225 .104 (.102) .018 .308 .038 (.058) .019 .509
Tech for Creating Content
 Tech→ Offline Interactions .035 (.051) .012 .491 −.120 (.049) −.040 .014 −.010 (.028) −.008 .715
 Offline Interactions →Tech −.024 (.038) −.009 .527 .013 (.039) .005 .736 −.003 (.015) −.004 .836
Total Screen Time
 Tech→ Offline Interactions .027 (.013) .043 .038 −.007 (.016) −.011 .656 −.003 (.005) −.013 .490
 Offline Interactions →Tech −.220 (.150) −.020 .142 .348 (.218) .032 .110 −.002 (.074) −.001 .980

Note. 5270 daily observations, N=388. Associations between each type of daily technology use and each parent-adolescent offline interaction are tested in separate multilevel models with person-mean centered variables. Auto-regressive, same-day, and covariate (daily school attendance and day in study) associations modeled but not depicted. Significant relations bolded. No association met FDR-corrected significance level. Raw regression coefficients (standard errors) reported.