Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;116(4):980–987. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.109

Table 2.

Cycle outcomes compared before and during coronavirus disease 2019.

Cycle characteristics and outcomes Before COVID-19 (6/17/19 to 2/28/20) During COVID-19 (6/17/20 to 2/28/21) P value
COS cycles initiated (n) 1,352 1,693 .02
Retrieval performed 1,241 (92%) 1,591 (94%)
Cycle canceled 111 (8%) 102 (6%)
Reason for cancelation .01
Low response 98 (88%) 74 (73%)
Premature ovulation 8 (7%) 14 (14%)
Positive COVID-19 PCR 6 (6%)
Other 5 (5%) 8 (8%)
Cycle type .19
In vitro fertilization 858 (63%) 1,142 (67%)
Elective oocyte cryopreservation 347 (26%) 383 (23%)
Elective embryo banking 62 (5%) 70 (4%)
Medical oocyte cryopreservation 29 (2%) 42 (2%)
Medical embryo banking 23 (2%) 27 (2%)
Oocyte donation 33 (2%) 29 (2%)
Cycle characteristics
Total gonadotropins, median 3,925 IU 3,900 IU .49
Day 2 FSH,c median 6.1 mIU/mL 7.4 mIU/mL <.01
Day 2 estradiol,c median 56 pg/mL 41 pg/mL <.01
Estradiol on trigger day,c median 2,421 pg/mL 2,626 pg/mL .01
Cycle outcomes
Total oocytes, median 14 13 .30
Vitrified metaphase II oocytes,a median 11 12 .35
Two-pronuclear zygotes,b median 7.0 7.0 .58
Vitrified blastocysts,b median 3.0 4.0 .63
Blast utilization rate,b median 57% 58% .74
Cycles with fresh embryo transfersb 5.1% 4.2% .33

Note: COS = controlled ovarian stimulation, COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone, PCR = polymerase chain reaction.

a

Oocyte cryopreservation cycles only.

b

In vitro fertilization or embryo banking cycles only.

c

Different laboratory platforms used to evaluate these samples before and during COVID-19.