Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;110(6):841–850. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01763-1

Table 2.

Procedural details of AF patients undergoing index versus repeat ablation

Index (n = 3377) Repeat (n = 738) p value
Energy form used
 Radiofrequency 77.0% 94.6%  < 0.001
 Cryoballoon 21.7% 5.4%  < 0.001
Rhythm before ablation
 Sinus rhythm 68.5% 68.2% 0.85
 Atrial fibrillation 31.5% 31.8% 0.85
 Pulmonary vein isolation
 Circumferential 87.9% 78.0%  < 0.001
 Segmental 12.4% 16.0% 0.008
Ablation strategy
 Linear lesion 14.6% 26.6%  < 0.001
  Location LA 49.2% 60.7% 0.006
  Location RA 56.7% 57.7% 0.82
  Location CTI 97.1% 92.9% 0.055
 CFAE 7.8% 25.1%  < 0.001
 Irrigated-tip catheters 70.0% 90.7%  < 0.001
Mapping, imaging, and study
 Conventional mapping 39.3% 40.2% 0.63
 EAM 58.0% 58.3% 0.88
 Pre-procedural imaging 25.2% 16.7%  < 0.001
 Mean RF application duration (sec) 2580 (1657; 3656) 1960 (1038; 3405)  < 0.001
 Mean fluoroscopy time (min) 29 (20; 46) 27 (17; 44)  < 0.001
 Mean dose area product (cGY × cm2) 3744 (1898; 7234) 3325 (1754; 6229) 0.001
 Mean study duration (min) 181.2 ± 71.9 163.6 ± 67.1  < 0.001

All values are given as percentages or mean with standard deviation or quartiles. P value < 0.05 was considered significant

LA Left Atrium; RA Right Atrium; CTI Cavo-tricuspid Isthmus; CFAE Complex Fractioned Atrial Electrograms; EAM Electroanatomical Mapping; RF Radiofrequency; sec Seconds; min Minutes