Table 1.
Name | Format | Isotype | Derived from | Features | Target | NET inhibition | Pharmacological activity (mouse models) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
h-tACPA | Human | hIgG1/κ | Human scFv RA library | NA | citH2A and citH4 | Yes | CAIA |
m-tACPA | Mouse | mIgG1/κ | Hybridoma screen | NA | citH2A and citH4 | Yes | CAIA, PF, colitis |
ch-tACPA | Chimerized | h-mIgG1/κ | m-tACPA | Mouse variable and human constant domains | citH2A and citH4 | Yes | CAIA |
hz-tACPA | Humanized | hIgG1/κ | ch-tACPA | CDR grafted and germlined | citH2A and citH4 | Yes | CAIA, sepsis, CIA |
dc-tACPA | Development candidate | hIgG1/κ | hz-tACPA | Isomerization removed in light chain CDR1 | citH2A and citH4 | Yes | CAIA, peritonitis |
NA not applicable
We engineered different tACPA molecules that have distinct features. Each time an improved molecule became available, we used it in our experiments. The development of these antibodies occurred step-by-step as follows: (1) h-tACPA was obtained from a human scFv RA library screen. The tACPA target was discovered using h-tACPAs; (2) m-tACPA was derived from a hybridoma screen; (3) ch-tACPA was generated from m-tACPA; (4) hz-tACPA was generated through ch-tACPA optimization; and (5) hz-tACPA optimization finally resulted in dc-tACPA. During the course of lead optimization efforts of tACPA, we tested the individual molecules, which all demonstrated NET-inhibiting capacities in vitro as well as in vivo pharmacological activity in the CAIA mouse model of IA